When Financially Deprived Employees May Shift Moral Standards - Ideas for Leaders
Idea #227

When Financially Deprived Employees May Shift Moral Standards

This is one of our free-to-access content pieces. To gain access to all Ideas for Leaders content please Log In Here or if you are not already a Subscriber then Subscribe Here.
Main Image
Main Image


Although moral standards are valued unequivocally, moral behaviour is another story. Under certain conditions, people will let their moral standards shift. New research shows that financial deprivation is one of those conditions and this can have an impact in the workplace.


Academic research supports the anecdotal evidence that people value moral standards. And yet, academic research also supports the suggestion that people don’t always seem to act in concert with their stated beliefs. There are certain conditions or situations in which people allow themselves to loosen their moral standards.

A team of leading researchers in the field of morality and ethics decided to test whether financial deprivation is one of those conditions. Will people who feel deprived financially compromise their moral standards? Will they cheat more? Will they be more lenient with others who cheat?

To answer these questions, the research team — Eesha Sharma of the Tuck School of Business, Nina Mazar of the Rotman School of Management, Adam Alter of the Stern School of Business and Dan Ariely of the Fuqua School of Business — conducted a pilot survey and five experiments. The result of the research was a mixed bag: financial deprivation is sometimes but not always a reason for lowering moral standards.

Specifically, the research showed that people say that financial deprivation  should not excuse immoral behaviour and that people predict that financial deprivation would not lead them to behave immorally.When financially deprived, however, they will let their moral standards slip, engaging in questionable behaviour. And they will judge others suffering from financial deprivation less harshly.

The research was based on transient financial deprivation (as opposed to chronic financial deprivation). The researchers also emphasize that this transient financial deprivation does not cause people to throw out their moral standards, but rather justify a “shift” of these standards to allow for questionable behaviour. In other words, even when they are cheating, they don’t feel that they are doing something really wrong, but instead are just using what means they can to redress an unfair situation.

This explains why the research showed three conditions under which moral standards are not compromised even in the face of financial deprivation:

  • when cheating won’t help to improve the financial condition
  • when the financial deprivation is deserved
  • when the immoral act is unfair.


Moral equivocating in the face of financial deprivation has a number of implications for companies and organizations.

To begin with, companies need to be aware of the impact of deprivation. Companies or executives with the wrong priorities may be overconfident about the power that they have over employees, and specifically unhappy employees. High unemployment, for example, may encourage companies to freeze the wages of front-line employees even though they may be handsomely increasing C-suite compensation. After all, what will employees do: quit? Not necessarily, but given that financial deprivation leads to lower moral standards, employees will find other less ethical ways to respond to an unfair financial situation. Expect office supplies to start disappearing, for example. Or expect productivity to be deliberately lowered.

On the other hand, the research shows that if the deprivation is not unfair, financial hard times won’t be allowed to excuse immoral activity. If a company is facing a financial crisis, and all wages are frozen or lowered, employees won’t necessarily respond by cheating the company at every opportunity.

Likewise, the research suggests that even financial deprived employees won’t attack the company is ways that are patently unfair to the company.

In sum, a company will get what it deserves. If you are cheating your employees financially, or causing unnecessary financial hardship, employees — even the ones who most ardently profess high moral standards — aren’t going to simply turn the other cheek.



“Financial Deprivation Selectively Shifts Moral Standards and Compromises Moral Decisions,” by Eesha Sharma, Nina Mazar, Adam L. Alter and Dan Ariely, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, September 10, 2013. 

Ideas for Leaders is a free-to-access site. If you enjoy our content and find it valuable, please consider subscribing to our Developing Leaders Quarterly publication, this presents academic, business and consultant perspectives on leadership issues in a beautifully produced, small volume delivered to your desk four times a year.


Idea conceived

September 10, 2013

Idea posted

Oct 2013
challenge block
Can't find the Idea you are after?
Then 'Challenge Us' to source it.


For the less than the price of a coffee a week you can read over 650 summaries of research that cost universities over $1 billion to produce.

Use our Ideas to:

  • Catalyse conversations with mentors, mentees, peers and colleagues.
  • Keep program participants engaged with leadership thinking when they return to their workplace.
  • Create a common language amongst your colleagues on leadership and management practice
  • Keep up-to-date with the latest thought-leadership from the world’s leading business schools.
  • Drill-down on the original research or even contact the researchers directly

Speak to us on how else you can leverage this content to benefit your organization.