'Power shortage’ is not just a term for the energy industry; executives frequently experience deficits in their power to influence as well. According to this Idea, there are three power sources that need to be maintained in order to avoid, or recover from, a power deficit.
Have you ever found yourself in the frustrating position of voicing suggestions that for some reason keep going unheard? You are not alone; even the most talented of executives often reach such a stage in their careers where they find themselves short of the power and influence needed to get things done. Such power deficits can happen to anyone, from people with high potential to senior executives who are experienced high performers.
According to IMD Business School’s Jean-Louis Barsoux and Cyril Bouquet, power-deficient executives usually lack one or more of the following “power sources”:
These three sources of power interact constantly, which means that a shortage in one can easily produce shortages in the other two. Fortunately, Barsoux and Bouquet suggest that these deficits are reversible.
Methodology: Over a two-year period, Barsoux and Bouquet studied 179 participants of IMD’s Program for Executive Development. This was done through interviews, as well as essay writing on the part of the participants, through which the researchers sought to identify the types of situations in which the lack of an ability to effect meaningful change was felt. Through an analysis of their findings, they then developed the conceptual framework outlined in this Idea.
Firstly, executives need to assess which power sources they may be lacking. Then, either by ‘playing the game’ more effectively, or changing the game, they can set about trying to reverse their power deficits. Barsoux and Bouquet define these two strategies as what you do in the job, and what you do with the job, respectively.
For example, if lack of legitimacy is the issue, try aligning yourself more with your boss’s expectations, and ensure that he/she notices your efforts (i.e. play the game).
If a lack of resources is the problem, try turning yourself into a resource (i.e. change the game). Gain special expertise to acquire more stature and security within your organization. On the other hand, you may prefer to seek opportunities to help senior executives and other powerful people, which will help them come to see you as a valuable ally (play the game).
If a lack of your own network is your concern, try connecting with a senior figure outside your direct line of authority (play the game); this can offer a private view into the upper echelons of your organization, and they may even vouch for your character, performance and accomplishments. Instead, you could try to act as a link with other networks (change the game).
Ultimately, however, executives should avoid the inclination to focus on a single power base; all three sources of power will need to be addressed to truly cast off a power deficit.
Ideas for Leaders is a free-to-access site. If you enjoy our content and find it valuable, please consider subscribing to our Developing Leaders Quarterly publication, this presents academic, business and consultant perspectives on leadership issues in a beautifully produced, small volume delivered to your desk four times a year.
For the less than the price of a coffee a week you can read over 650 summaries of research that cost universities over $1 billion to produce.
Use our Ideas to:
Speak to us on how else you can leverage this content to benefit your organization. firstname.lastname@example.org