Non-financial rewards such as career-development opportunities and challenges and responsibilities have a much greater impact on staff motivation than salary and benefits. Cash and bonuses and a fair and transparent policy on pay are important to employees – so, too, are flexible benefits. But organizations need to take a ‘holistic’ view of compensation and think in terms of the ‘total rewards package’. Very few people are motivated solely by money.
A large-scale study by Vlerick Business School, in association with three media partners, De Standaard, La Libre Belgique and NRC Handelsblad, underlines the importance of non-financial rewards to employees.
The study, based on a poll of 4,877 people in Flanders, Wallonia and the Netherlands working in 18 different sectors, measured attitudes to salary, bonuses and benefits and also to non-financial components of compensation – ranging from time spent travelling to work to pride in the employer.
The results point to employee demand for:
They also stress the importance of:
Employees were generally quite satisfied with the level of their pay and their bonuses and with the benefits they received. However, they were less satisfied with what might be termed ‘procedural justice’ – the way salaries and bonuses were determined and transparency about pay – and they wanted benefits to more closely reflect their personal needs and circumstances. Fairness and flexibility were key concerns.
When it came to non-financial rewards, there were two main priorities for employees: a development culture and the opportunity to follow training; the ability to participate in decision-making.
Importantly, the study found that the non-financial components of compensation had a much greater impact on employee engagement and motivation than salary and benefits. Challenges and responsibilities and the reputation of the employer and how the organization was perceived externally played a major role.
Financial rewards had slightly more influence over decisions to leave an organization. Here again, however, intrinsic factors were important – in particular, the relationship with the supervisor and mentoring and development opportunities.
At a time of continuing economic uncertainty and budgetary constraints, the survey looks like good news for employers keen to increase morale. Nonetheless, it uncovers some old concerns about fairness in the workplace: more than 20 percent of the sample disagreed that the difference between their pay and the CEO’s was ‘acceptable’.
Ideas for Leaders is a free-to-access site. If you enjoy our content and find it valuable, please consider subscribing to our Developing Leaders Quarterly publication, this presents academic, business and consultant perspectives on leadership issues in a beautifully produced, small volume delivered to your desk four times a year.
For the less than the price of a coffee a week you can read over 650 summaries of research that cost universities over $1 billion to produce.
Use our Ideas to:
Speak to us on how else you can leverage this content to benefit your organization. email@example.com