A new study shows that collaborating with suppliers, rather than just monitoring them, is more effective in ensuring that they are engaging in green and sustainable practices. Internal non-coercive drivers (for example, pressure from top management rather than government regulators) encourage buyer/supplier collaboration.
Many companies recognize the reputational risk of the environmental reputation of their suppliers. As a result, companies launch green supply chain management (GSCM) initiatives, working with suppliers to ensure that their activities and processes are environmentally friendly.
There are two ways for companies to engage with suppliers on environmental issues. One is to monitor their environmental performance. For example, companies might send their suppliers environmental audits, requesting the details of their practices and processes.
The second way to engage with suppliers is to proactively collaborate with them on pro-environment practices and processes. Collaboration can include providing suppliers with resources such as materials, standards or technologies; jointly developing more environmentally friendly products; and helping them to implement sustainable production processes.
Internal and external factors known as “environmental drivers” will impact the implementation and success of a company’s monitoring and collaboration activities. Government regulations, top management support, influence from customers and best practices from competitors are examples of some of these drivers, which can be categorized as either coercive (e.g., government regulations, environmental standards) or non-coercive (e.g., top management support, customer influence, industry best practices).
A new study from Esade Business School in Barcelona and the Universidad Carlos III in Madrid explored the effectiveness of monitoring and collaborative GSCM on the environmental performance of suppliers — and whether coercive or non-coercive environmental drivers made a difference. The study was based on survey answers from more than 70 purchasing and supply chain managers working in a variety of Spanish industries. The surveys questioned the managers on their GSCM practices, environmental performance (e.g. reduced waste, reduced environmental risks, and improved environmental reputation), and GSCM environmental drivers.
The results of the survey study revealed the following:
Companies recognize the importance of a positive environmental image. Internally, they need to ensure that their own activities and processes are environmentally friendly. This study demonstrates, however, that company must focus externally as well, working with their suppliers to improve their impact on the environment.
The second lesson of this study is that simply monitoring suppliers is not enough. Companies must engage in joint projects and initiatives to ensure the highest environmental performance. This collaboration can be undermined rather than reinforced by external pressure. It’s best to use internal motivators (e.g., top management initiative rather than compliance) for GSCM.
Green Supply Chain Management Approaches: Drivers And Performance Implications. Elcio M. Tachizawa, Cristina Gimenez & Vicenta Sierra. International Journal of Operations & Production Management (November 2015).
Ideas for Leaders is a free-to-access site. If you enjoy our content and find it valuable, please consider subscribing to our Developing Leaders Quarterly publication, this presents academic, business and consultant perspectives on leadership issues in a beautifully produced, small volume delivered to your desk four times a year.
For the less than the price of a coffee a week you can read over 650 summaries of research that cost universities over $1 billion to produce.
Use our Ideas to:
Speak to us on how else you can leverage this content to benefit your organization. firstname.lastname@example.org