KEY CONCEPT

Hattie and Timperley’s research shows that feedback is one of the most powerful influences on learning and performance, but only when it is specific, actionable, and focused on the right level. Effective feedback answers three core questions:

• Where am I going?
• How am I going?
• Where to next?

When feedback targets the task, the process, or self‑regulation, it improves learning. When it focuses on praise, rewards, or the self, it often has little effect or even a negative impact.

---

IDEA SUMMARY

In their influential review, Hattie and Timperley analyse more than 7,000 studies to understand what makes feedback effective. They begin by defining feedback as ‘information provided by an agent regarding aspects of one’s performance or understanding’, noting that it is only powerful when embedded in a meaningful learning context.

Their paper shows that feedback has an average effect size of 0.79, placing it among the most impactful influences on achievement, higher than homework, socioeconomic status, or class size. However, the effects vary widely depending on the type of feedback. Task‑specific information, cues, and guidance on how to improve are highly effective. Praise, rewards, and punishment have minimal or even negative effects.

Hattie and Timperley propose a model in which effective feedback reduces the gap between current performance and a desired goal. This model centres on three questions:

• Where am I going? (clarity of goals and success criteria)
• How am I going? (information about progress)
• Where to next? (guidance on next steps)

These correspond to feed up, feed back, and feed forward.

Feedback operates at four levels:

1. Task-level accuracy or correctness
2. Process-level strategies and methods
3. Self‑regulation level monitoring, directing, and evaluating
4. Self-level personal praise or evaluation

The first three levels improve learning; the fourth does not. The document notes that praise ‘contains so little learning‑related information’ that it rarely improves performance.

The authors also highlight the importance of task complexity, goal difficulty, and threat to self‑esteem. Feedback is most effective when goals are challenging but clear, when tasks are not overly complex, and when learners feel psychologically safe.

Overall, the paper provides a rigorous, evidence‑based framework for understanding why some feedback accelerates learning while other forms hinder it.

---

BUSINESS APPLICATION

Hattie and Timperley’s insights apply directly to leadership, performance management, and organizational learning.

1. Make goals clear and specific.
   People cannot act on feedback if they do not understand what success looks like. Leaders must define clear outcomes and success criteria before giving feedback.
2. Focus on improvement, not evaluation.n
   Feedback should reduce the gap between current and desired performance. This means focusing on how to improve, not simply judging performance.
3. Target the right lev.el

• Task feedback helps with accuracy.
• Process feedback improves strategies and problem‑solving.
• Self‑regulation feedback builds autonomy and ownership.
• Self‑level feedback (“Great job!”) rarely improves performance.

4. Avoid praise as a primary tool.
   Praise feels good, but does not build capability. It contains little information and can even reduce motivation by shifting focus to approval rather than learning.
5. Create low‑threat environments
   Feedback is most effective when people feel safe. High‑threat environments reduce attention to feedback and increase defensiveness.
6. Use feedback to build capability, not compliance
   The most powerful feedback strengthens self‑regulation, the ability to monitor, evaluate, and adjust one’s own performance. This is the foundation of high performance and continuous improvement.

For leaders, the message is clear: feedback is not about telling people how they perform, but it is about helping them improve their performance.

---

•   DOWNLOAD IDEA
•   PIN TO MY IDEAS
•   PRINT IDEA
•   LIKE

---